stockstar-fund-rating@1.0.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "查询公募基金评级数据，数据来源证券之星（fund.stockstar.com）， 涵盖上海证券、国泰海通、银河证券、招商证券、晨星、济安金信、 天相投顾七家评级机构。支持输入基金代码查询各机构星级评级。 触发词：基金、评级、基金评级、星级、基金推荐、五星基金、 晨星评级、上海证券评级、银河证券评级、招商证券评级、 济安金信评级、天相投顾评级、国泰海通评级、证券之星基金" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 906 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim stockstar1996: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.