stock-deep-backtest@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "股票深度回测(Stock Deep Backtest)技能 —— 基于 QuantAll(全A解析)MCP, 对"已回测的策略"做深度诊断:策略为什么有效/失效、最终在哪儿赚钱、能否用入场因子筛选改善。 三层能力:① 四个回测视角(summary 成绩单 / detail 横截面 / segments 持仓片段 / timeline 时序净值); ② 原生分组(行业/市值/交易所/时间 + 热力图);③ 因子筛选改善(单/双/多因子 → 片段收益对比)。 固定调用指令已固化为 tasks/*.json,run_task_file 可直接执行;深度分析由 scripts/ 脚本完成; 一键完整链" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 5,478 lines in 52 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim mifochen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.