Skills/ClawHub/social-collaboration-mind

social-collaboration-mind@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "社会协作心智:心智理论(ToM)+自适应协作策略。从协作伙伴的信号(专业度/置信度/忙碌度/情绪/历史失信) 推断其状态,动态选择协作策略——委派/咨询/监督/结对/回避,让 agent 像"懂事的人"一样与人及他者 agent 协作,而非机械执行。纯标准库、零依赖、可本地实跑(--selftest 自带样例)。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qq435912743 · publishing for 88 daysInstalls 391Last detonated 12 h ago
$clawhub install social-collaboration-mind
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 446 lines in 6 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈590 tok
1 file · 6 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.