smartlib-citation-checker@3.6.8
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "核查用户提交的论文稿件或AI生成参考文献是否真实，防止AI幻觉。基于SmartLib API，输出HTML核查报告（含差异标记、验证链接、统计分析）。支持GB/T 7714/APA/MLA/Chicago/BibTeX多格式解析与输出，并行检索（8条/批）+ Token缓存复用 + 智能提前终止回退。✨ 亮点：核..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 3,243 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim j-levee: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.