Skills/ClawHub/smart-code-review

smart-code-review@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "AI 驱动的代码审查工具。对代码变更进行多维度审查,输出结构化的 Review 意见。 **当以下情况时使用此 Skill**: (1) 需要对代码进行 Code Review (2) 需要审查 PR/MR 的代码变更 (3) 用户提到"code review"、"代码审查"、"帮我看看代码"、"这段代码有问题吗..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher caingao · publishing for 175 daysInstalls 1,692Last detonated 3 h ago
$clawhub install smart-code-review
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-15 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 828 lines in 5 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,079 tok
1 file · 5 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

smart-code-review@1.0.0 safety verdict: Verified (install only) — KillerSkills