skill-self-improve@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "给任意 WorkBuddy 技能注入「自进化学习系统」,让它越用越好用、越用越高效。 通过通用 learner.py 记录每次使用的成败与用户偏好,自动复盘并给出改进建议。 一键批量注入:复制学习模块、初始化记忆文件、在 SKILL.md 追加自进化章节。 适用:准备发布或已上线的技能、想加自我迭代能力的任何技能。 触发词:自进化、自我复盘、自动迭代、越用越好用、学习系统、skill 自我改进。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
r = subprocess.run([PY, os.path.join(scripts, "learner.py"), "init", d],Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.No other findings across 418 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qq435912743: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Python subprocess execution detected≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.