skill-quality-meeting-planner@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "基于用户提供的质量数据和工作问题，自动解析多格式输入并提取议题要点，生成包含会议流程、讨论目标和预期产出的质量周会策划方案Word文档；当用户需要策划质量周会、整理质量数据生成会议方案、准备质量会议材料、或组织质量评审会议时使用" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
python scripts/generate_meeting_doc.py --input meeting_data.json --output 质量周会策划方案.docxFix: Remove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.No other findings across 654 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duding-engicool: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- File type combined with upload action≈ +2 on the totalRemove the call, or declare the host in frontmatter and explain in the README what is sent and why.