skill-quality-gate@1.0.10
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "Nine-dimension skill quality validation (frontmatter fields, scripts readable, icon, README, no secrets, bilingual, triggers, gate section, desensitized) before marketplace submission or go-live; per-dimension pass/fail, no release without passing the gate. 技能质量门禁:把 skill/提示词/agent 配置提交市场或上线前做 9 维校验(frontmatter 八字段/脚本可读/图标/README/无密钥/双语/触发词/门禁节/去敏),逐维 pass/fail,不过闸不发布。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 366 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.