skill-qms-objective-decomposition@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "质量管理体系质量目标分解与审核辅助技能。两种模式：(1) 分解模式——从公司级质量方针/战略目标出发，生成三维度（部门/工序/时间）目标分解矩阵并做 SMART 校验；(2) 审核模式——对用户现有的质量目标分解文档做 ISO 9001 6.2 条款符合性诊断，输出带严重度的审核建议。内置 5 条通用交互规则。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 219 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duding-engicool: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.