skill-poka-yoke-design@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "面向工艺/质量工程师的防错（Poka-Yoke）设计技能。核心是"遇到问题，用防错方式解决"——基于新乡重夫方法论，按 E-R-F-D-M 五大原则与十大原理主动构思候选方案，用"不制造>不传递>不接受"效果等级优选，输出可落地的防错设计方案。覆盖设计植入与现产缺陷再发防止。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 192 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duding-engicool: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.