skill-pestel-analysis@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "交互引导式的 PESTEL 宏观环境分析工具。通过六道强制交互采集门（政治/经济/社会/技术/环境/法律），由 Agent 引导用户提供真实信息、而非替用户生成内容；最终输出专业 MD 文档与精美网页版报告，用于战略演示与决策讨论。通用战略分析工具，质量管理仅为应用方向之一。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 222 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duding-engicool: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.