skill-compliance@1.2.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Skill上架合规检查器（面向国内平台）。在上传前检查skill是否符合国内监管要求，包括金融敏感词、免责声明、安全红线等。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
"description": "检测到从外部URL动态拉取并执行脚本的模式（curl|bash, wget|sh等）。这种运行时获取外部代码的行为存在供应链安全风险，攻击者可劫持URL指向恶意代码。建议将外部依赖打包在发布包中。",Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.No other findings across 4,404 lines in 14 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim wwumit: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Remote installer piped to shell≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.