skill-builder@1.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI Agent 技能构建助手，基于 agentic skills 框架（参考 obra/superpowers 思想）。用于：(1) 从零创建新技能，(2) 根据用户需求设计技能结构，(3) 编写 SKILL.md 和配套脚本/引用文件，(4) 打包和发布技能。当用户说"创建一个技能"、"帮我做个 XX 助手"、"做一个能 XX 的能力"、或任何涉及构建 AI Agent 功能模块的需求时触发此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 133 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim nima54851: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.