Skills/ClawHub/skill-auditor-exam-reviewer

skill-auditor-exam-reviewer@0.1.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "注册审核员考试主观题复习工具，支持五个科目（认证通用基础、管理体系认证基础、质量/环境/职业健康安全管理体系基础）的历年真题浏览、模拟练习、答案批改与解析；当用户需要备考审核员考试、练习主观题、查询知识点或生成复习计划时使用" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher duding-engicool · publishing for 119 daysInstalls 536Last detonated 30 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-11 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 203 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈465 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim duding-engicool: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim duding-engicoolPropose a patch to the maintainer