skill-2@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "根據用戶提供的「寫作風格描述」與「指定的生成內容」，分析該寫作風格並依此撰寫一篇符合要求的文章。用戶必須提供以下五項資訊：1.用詞偏好 2.句式習慣 3.結構特點 4.語氣風格 5.指定的生成內容（主題/用途）。務必在以下情況觸發此技能：用戶輸入 /skill-2、$skill-2、skill-2；用戶提供一組風格描述（涵蓋用詞、句式、結構、語氣等要素）並要求依此寫一篇文章、文案、報告或其他內容；用戶說「照這個風格幫我寫一篇……」且附上風格說明而非原文範文（若用戶是提供原文範文要求分析或仿寫，應改用 skill-1）。這是一個強制檢查型技能：若用戶提供的五項資訊中有任何一項缺失或不明確，必須暫" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 153 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim awwsunny: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.