skill-1@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "分析用戶提供的圖片內容或文檔，從「用詞偏好」「句式習慣」「結構特點」「語氣風格」四個維度總結寫作風格，並可依據此風格特點生成新文章。務必在以下情況觸發此技能：用戶輸入 /skill-1、/skill-2、$skill-1、$skill-2、skill-1 或 skill-2；用戶要求分析某段文字、圖片、文檔的寫作風格、文筆、語氣或用詞習慣；用戶要求「模仿」「仿寫」「用同樣的風格寫一篇」某篇範文或參考資料；用戶提供一篇或多篇範文並要求依照其風格產出新內容。即使用戶沒有明確使用「風格分析」一詞，只要意圖是提取/複製某段文字的寫作特徵，都應觸發此技能。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 141 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim awwsunny: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.