sikll@2.26.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "佛教讲说/复讲/授课/演讲的自动评测与评分工具（通用版）。上传音频或视频（不支持纯文字稿），自动转写→双轨评估（讲说风格+内容分类）→六维打分（教义准确/结构逻辑/语言表达/契机应变/感悟感染/自主发挥）→生成图表化 HTML 报告。含结构大纲（简短 inline、较长换行）、来源比对（L0 大藏经+L1 天台藏+关键断言核验，去数字 ID，附 CBETA 行级深链）、读稿检测、音频-文本对齐分析、★讲述性质识别（仅在有实锤时显示复讲判定模块；v2.26 增强来源核验行级深链，v2.25 增强收尾自陈复讲/复述识别与卡顿/重复特征）、★复讲/副讲独立量表（与原创讲授解耦，前台仅展示判定依据/加分项/减分项/说明四项；后台增强开场结尾仪式提取、念诵溯源、卡顿与前后重复密度）。输出配色与版式已固化，跨平台（WorkBuddy/IMA/其他大模型）渲染一致。触发词：讲经评测、讲评分析、佛教演讲评分、复讲评价、授课评估、佛学讲说打分。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 450 lines in 5 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim gouchunlei2-png: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.