self-relationship@0.1.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "帮助一个人更好地理解自己、接纳自己、调整自己，并在现实中做出更适合自己的选择。适用于用户谈论"与自己相处"、"自我关系"、"自我接纳"、"自我理解"、"认识自己"、"自我成长"、self-relationship、self-acceptance、self-understanding、self-growth 等话题时。不要试图把人变成"更完美的人"，不要把测试结果变成定义自己的标签。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 1,583 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim c-jeril: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.