self-play-coevolution@1.0.0
VERIFIED· install onlyPublisher claims: "自我博弈对抗进化：让同一个智能体轮流扮演 proposer（提案者）与 critic（批判者），两边互相找茬、互相修补， 逐轮把提案质量与批判敏锐度一起推高，彼此越迭代越强。这是一线大模型几乎不具备、且决定能否可证明地变强的能力。 当用户要求自我博弈、对抗共进化、proposer/critic 闭环、越迭代越强、GAN 式自训练时使用。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Coverage
Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.- Tested
- every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
- Not tested
- use of the skill by an agent
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 505 lines in 6 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.