self-intro@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "帮求职者撰写面试自我介绍稿。当用户要准备面试自我介绍、说"帮我写个自我介绍""面试要怎么介绍自己""一分钟自我介绍""群面自我介绍"，或提供了自己的经历/简历和目标岗位希望生成开场陈述时触发。支持按面试时长（30秒/1分钟/3分钟）、面试形式（群面/单面/终面HR）和公司行业类型定制。即使用户没有明说"自我介绍"..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 221 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim shutongzhou1222: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.