Skills/ClawHub/screenclaw

screenclaw@0.1.7

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "用“截图 + 坐标网格”的方式操作任意桌面软件:截带网格的图,让任意多模态大模型读出目标的坐标数字,再调用点击/输入/按键等 API ,模拟人类视觉化操作软件。还能录制一次操作并沉淀成可复用的场景模板,下次直接复用。不依赖目标软件提供 API 或 CLI。 出现以下情况时使用: - 自动化操作 Windows 桌..." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher ginsing1226 · publishing for 144 daysInstalls 723Last detonated 44 h ago
$clawhub install screenclaw
WatchReport an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.
Tested
every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested
use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 93/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

No findings across 3,802 lines in 49 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,094 tok
1 file · 49 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.