Skills/ClawHub/scene-recast-video

scene-recast-video@1.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Remake a known scene with a new cast: give a video model a short reference clip (a film scene, a dance, a fight, a news shot, a meme) plus photos of your own characters and a "replace, keep, never" prompt, and get your version with the motion, timing, camera and cuts of the original. Covers trimming the clip, character references, the recast prompt, new dialogue, the first-frame lock, the motion-only plate (greyscale or depth), three varg routes (Seedance 2.5 with a video reference, MiniMax H3 Max Recast, Wan 3), a frame-by-frame check against the source and a stacked original-vs-remake export. Use when someone wants a parody of a movie scene, "this scene but with X", a character swap, a motion-control remake, a live-action version of a game or anime scene, a meme recast, or asks how the Higgsfield Genjutsu / Seedance video-reference remakes on X are made. For the joke, format choice and the rules for real people use ai-parody-video; for a talking monologue use multi-angle-monologue." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher vargai · publishing for 215 daysInstalls 107Last detonated 29 h ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 64/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agent. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

CRITICAL
HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentREADME.md:1 · HTML comment carrying imperative instructions to the agentGenerated by .github/readme/build.ts from SKILL.md files and .github/readme/*.json. Edit those and run `bun .github/readme/build.ts`; CI fails when this file isFix: Keep SKILL.md to visible, descriptive text. Remove comments and encoded text that address the agent.
AST01

No other findings across 232 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈3,512 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

16 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim vargai: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. Hidden instructions≈ +6 on the totalRemove HTML comments, zero-width characters and white-on-white text that carry instructions. Everything the agent is meant to read should be visible to the person reading the file.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim vargaiPropose a patch to the maintainer