safety-guardrails@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "给自主智能体/自动化流水线装上一道「预执行安全护栏」：对任何待执行动作做风险分级 （low/medium/high/critical）并给出 ALLOW / CONFIRM / DENY 决策。内置破坏性强、不可逆、 越权、外发隐私的 deny 规则与高影响 confirm 规则，强制拦截 rm -rf、强推、下载即执行、 删表、关机等高危动作，并要求用户显式确认中高危操作。适配自动化每小时触发的无人值守场景， 防止自主 agent 在没有护栏时造成不可逆损害。触发词：安全护栏、危险动作拦截、操作确认、 safety guardrails、agent 安全、预执行校验、destructive 拦截。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 65/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Notable findings: Destructive file system command detected; Destructive file system command detected. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
`git push --force`、`git reset --hard`、fork 炸弹、`curl|bash`/`wget|sh` 下载即执行。Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.python guardrails.py --action "rm -rf /data" --context '{"user_approved":false}'Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.d, n, _ = gate("rm -rf /data/important", {})Fix: Build commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
15 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qq435912743: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- Destructive file system command detected≈ +4 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments; do not interpolate untrusted strings into a shell.
- Remote installer piped to shell≈ +2 on the totalBuild commands from fixed arguments, never from interpolated strings; prefer an API client over shelling out.