ruankao-spgm-qa-1-0-0@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "挂接 IMA 知识库的软考高级「系统规划与管理师」智能问答 Skill——针对考生关于考情政策/知识点/真题解析/备考方法/IT 服务管理理论等问题，检索主库（真题/范文/考试大纲/教程）与次库（真实项目案例）给出可溯源的专业解答。当用户提及软考系规问答、系统规划与管理师知识点、IT 服务管理理论、系规考什么/怎么备考/历年真题、系规报名条件/合格标准等场景时触发。如需一对一论文指导，请与「一线评标专家」微信公众号联系" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 484 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chesaram: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.