ruankao-spgm-essay-scorer-1-0-0@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "模拟阅卷评分软考高级资格「系统规划与管理师」的考生论文。当用户粘贴论文全文、询问"这篇论文能得多少分/帮我打分/模拟阅卷/论文质量评估/系规论文评分"时触发，按官方 5 维评分标准（切题性/实践性/深度与广度/逻辑性/书面表达）逐项打分、折算官方 75 分制得模拟分并判是否过线，对照 IMA 主库真题/范文/大纲给出针对性改进建议。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 482 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chesaram: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.