ruankao-spgm-essay-helper@1.0.2
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "辅助备考软考高级资格「系统规划与管理师」的考生，根据用户输入的论文题目与本人真实项目背景，结合 IMA 备考资料库（历年真题/参考范文/考试大纲/教程）生成符合官方评分标准的论文框架与写作提示。论文背景仅来自考生本人真实项目，不引用任何第三方真实项目资料。当用户提及系统规划与管理师论文、系规论文、IT服务管理论文、软考系规论文大纲/框架/模板、软考高级论文（系统规划与管理师方向）等场景时触发。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 578 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim chesaram: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.