review-radar-skill-3@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "显示器评测视频情报提取。给 OpenClaw 一个 B 站/YouTube 评测视频链接，自动转写口播音频并产出结构化评测情报卡（实测数据、优缺点、博主结论、竞品提及），也可批量处理多个链接并汇总。当用户提到"总结评测视频""显示器评测报告""批量看评测""评测情报"时使用。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 163 lines in 9 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim ford828: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.