resize-for-banner@1.0.5
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "Resize an image into a Twitter/X header banner (5:2, 1500x600) using ImageMagick. The image is rescaled to fit and the leftover space is padded black — never cropped, so no content is lost. Use when the user wants a Twitter/X banner for an article or infographic. Twitter/X is the only target: LinkedIn and blog headers accept the original image, so never generate a derivative for them. Never overwrites the original — writes a new file beside it." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 139 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim j3ffyang: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.