Skills/ClawHub/research-quality-gate

research-quality-gate@1.0.3

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "调研 / 情报产物的质量门禁与多 agent 协作规范，用于回答「这份调研报告靠不靠谱」「结论有没有过度推断」「怎么判断评估本身有没有偏」这类问题" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher zhaoxinghua09-cell · joined 6 days agoInstalls 362Last detonated 4d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 249 lines in 5 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim zhaoxinghua09-cell: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim zhaoxinghua09-cell