research-assistant@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "AI科研全流程助理。覆盖文献检索→文献阅读→文献综述→研究选题→研究设计→数据分析→ 论文写作→润色校对→引用管理→投稿选刊→基金申请→学术汇报12大模块。输入研究方向/ 问题/论文/数据，自动生成交互式HTML可视化报告。面向硕博研究生、高校教师、科研人员， 一站式解决从idea到publication的全链路..." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-12 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 2,068 lines in 8 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim bettermen: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.