Skills/ClawHub/reply-polish

reply-polish@1.2.1

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "润色用户已写好的中文工作沟通回复(微信/企业微信/钉钉/邮件/同事间评论),使其自然、专业、像真人说话。 改的是已有草稿——发给具体某人/某群的双向沟通消息,无论长短;不是从零起草。保留原意和用户自己的说话方式, 去掉 AI 腔、公文腔和啰嗦客套,按受众(领导/产品/后端/同事/客户)微调语气。 TRIGGER(中文):"润色""顺一下""帮我改一下这段话""这样回复合适吗""这么说得体吗""改得自然一点" "太官腔了""像 AI 写的,帮我改像真人""发给 XX 前帮我把把关"。 DO NOT TRIGGER:只要沟通方法论、邮件模板、会议纪要框架(用 professional-communication,本技能只对具体草稿逐句润色,不给框架); 从零起草邮件或文档(用 internal-comms / write);优化给 AI 的提示词(用 prompt-optimizer); 面向公众、无具体收件人的成段文章去 AI 味重写(用 write / humanizer-zh);英文草稿润色(本技能规则仅覆盖中文,英文用 write)。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher stevenwangking · joined 6 days agoInstalls 210Last detonated 5d ago

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 170 lines in 2 files.

What would make this Verified

13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim stevenwangking: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim stevenwangking