Is relight@1.0.0 safe to install?

relight@1.0.0

VERIFIED· install only

Publisher claims: "Relight a still image — change the lighting setup, color temperature, direction, or mood — on RunComfy via the `runcomfy` CLI. Routes to Qwen Edit 2509's dedicated `relight` LoRA endpoint for purpose-built relighting, with fallback to identity-preserving edit endpoints (Nano Banana 2 Edit, GPT Image 2 Edit, FLUX Kontext Pro) when prose lighting language is enough. Use for product relighting (studio softbox → window light), portrait mood shift (overcast → golden hour), or color-grade change. Triggers on "relight", "relighting", "change the lighting", "make it golden hour", "studio lighting", "rim light", "blue hour", "soft window light", "change light direction", "color temperature", or any explicit ask to alter how a still is lit." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher permew · publishing for 107 daysInstalls 611Last detonated 4 h ago

$clawhub install relight

Watch Report an issue

Coverage

Nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only.

Tested: every file read, file written and host contacted by what ran
Not tested: use of the skill by an agent

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario; nothing executable in the bundle ran; the trace covers the install step only) on 2026-11-10 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). In what ran, nothing we could detect went wrong: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. What it does with a real credential was not observed; the static findings and the publisher carry the rest of the score. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations

t+CategoryObserved action

0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle

0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

0.0sprocessno install scripts to re-run

Static findings

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:176 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted code

- **Install via verified package manager only.** Use `npm i -g @runcomfy/cli` or `npx -y @runcomfy/cli`. **Agents must not pipe an arbitrary remote install script into a shell on the user's behalf**.

Fix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

MEDIUM

npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:40 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codenpm i -g @runcomfy/cli # or: npx -y @runcomfy/cli --versionFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.

AST06

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded

≈2,557 tok

1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.