Skills/ClawHub/regression-hunt

regression-hunt@1.0.0

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "Find what a change can break in the code that did NOT change — trace a diff, branch, commit range, or named feature outward through callers, consumers, shared state, and contracts, rank the concrete regression scenarios by blast radius, and prove or clear each one with an observed test run. Zero regressions is a valid outcome. Use this skill whenever the user says "look for regressions", "what could this break", "did this change break anything", "regression check", "impact of this change", "blast radius", "what else uses this", "is anything else affected", or "/regression-hunt" — even if they don't name the skill. Not for reviewing the diff's own quality (code-review) or a bug already observed (diagnose)." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher dennisrongo · publishing for 86 daysInstalls 324Last detonated 4d ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 197 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈2,587 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim dennisrongo: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim dennisrongoPropose a patch to the maintainer
regression-hunt@1.0.0 safety verdict: Caution (static only) — KillerSkills