ref-site-ui-tokens@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "用户说「参考 X 网站改 UI / 照着 X 的风格做 / X 那种配色」时的落地流程。在没有浏览器的机器上(agent-browser、playwright 都没装,或 Chrome/Edge 不在标准路径)用 curl + 标准库 Python 抓下目标站的真实设计 token(颜色、圆角、字重、字号、间距),再据此改本地样式表。含一个可直接跑的抓取脚本 scripts/fetch_tokens.py,以及「借什么 / 不借什么」的取舍框架与常见坑。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-26 and scored it 70/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 296 lines in 3 files.
What would make this Verified
10 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim oracis: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.