Skills/ClawHub/receiving-code-review

receiving-code-review@1.0.0

VERIFIED

Publisher claims: "Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performat... Use when 需要Development领域自动化处理、数据分析和流程编排时使用。不适用于无明确需求的模糊场景。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Registry ClawHubPublisher thcjp · joined 6 days agoInstalls 342Last detonated 2 h ago
$clawhub install receiving-code-review
WatchReport an issue

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.

Behavior trace

Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviations
t+CategoryObserved action
0.0sprocessno install scripts in bundle
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only
0.0sprocessscript backend runs setup only

Static findings

No findings across 301 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,669 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.