reading-notes@1.0.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "上传书籍文本 / 摘抄段落，梳理书籍核心框架、人物关系、核心论点、金句摘抄，分章节生成思维导图式结构化笔记。粘贴书籍内容或上传书籍截图，输出分层结构化笔记：全书整体框架、分章节核心论点、关键案例、可直接摘抄金句，逻辑清晰，适合读书报告、课堂作业使用。Use when the user asks for 读书笔记、读书报告、章节梳理、金句摘抄、人物关系、故事脉络、考点整理，或上传书籍文本/摘抄/截图要求结构化整理。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 67/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 348 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
13 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim cryptocxf: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- New publisher≈ +3 on the totalTime clears this on its own after 14 and 30 days. Claiming the handle (+50) is the fastest way past it.