rag-grounding-guard@1.0.7
VERIFIEDPublisher claims: "当用户说『RAG回答胡说八道/编造』『引用对不对』『回答有依据吗』『检索到的资料支撑不了结论』，或要给 RAG/检索增强回答做事实校验时使用。校验每条声明在检索来源里是否有支撑（ grounding 覆盖率），未覆盖的声明标红为幻觉风险，并要求来源带出处（有籍）。可运行脚本（grounding_check 校验器）。理论根基：LGD 三律之有籍(引用溯源)+有证(防幻觉可核验)。触发词：RAG校验、grounding、事实溯源、防幻觉、引用核查、检索支撑、hallucination、回答有依据吗。" Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-11-06 and scored it 90/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No findings across 343 lines in 7 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.