Skills/ClawHub/qqyougit-doubt-driven-development

qqyougit-doubt-driven-development@3.0.1

CAUTION· static only

Publisher claims: "对每个非平凡决策进行对抗性审查,防止Agent过度自信导致的错误。 当正确性比速度更重要时、在陌生领域工作时、高风险操作时触发。 触发场景:架构决策、非平凡代码提交、声称"这是安全的/可扩展的/符合规格的"、 不确定领域的工作、生产环境部署、数据迁移、不可逆操作。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher qqyougitcom · publishing for 149 daysInstalls 581Last detonated 9 h ago

Coverage

Static only; nothing was run yet.

The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-13 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

No findings across 244 lines in 2 files.

Cost to the agent

Instructions loaded
≈1,052 tok
1 file · 2 in bundle

Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.

Known vulnerabilities

Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.

What would make this Verified

9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qqyougitcom: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim qqyougitcomPropose a patch to the maintainer