qinghu-rednote-social@0.1.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "青虎AI 小红书社媒运营：结合小红书热搜榜、关键词搜索笔记、笔记内容与评论、达人主页与作品数据，完成「爆款笔记拆解 → 种草痛点提取 → 优质 KOC/KOL 筛选」，搭建高效种草与社媒矩阵方案，并可生成小红书种草码。当用户要做小红书运营、拆解爆款笔记、找种草选题、筛 KOC/KOL、看笔记评论痛点、搭内容矩阵时必须触发。关键词：青虎AI、小红书、种草、笔记、KOC、KOL、达人筛选、热搜、痛点、社媒矩阵、种草码。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 254 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim autoagc: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.