qinghu-bilibili-social@0.1.3
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "青虎AI B 站社媒运营：结合 B 站热搜榜、关键词视频搜索、视频数据与评论、UP 主信息与主页作品，完成「中长视频爆款脚本拆解 → 弹幕评论舆情把控 → 高黏性 UP 主投放匹配」的深度硬核种草方案。当用户要做 B 站运营、拆解中长视频脚本、找 UP 主投放、看视频评论舆情、做硬核种草时必须触发。关键词：青虎AI、B站、哔哩哔哩、UP主、中长视频、脚本拆解、评论舆情、投放匹配、硬核种草、恰饭。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-07 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 259 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim autoagc: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.