qa-test-strategy-design@1.8.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "当新项目启动需要制定测试方案、或者迭代开始前需要确定"这期怎么测"时使用此技能。根据项目特征(新项目/迭代/重构/紧急修复)、风险分布和资源约束设计分层测试策略,明确测试范围、测试手段、准入准出标准和工具选型。一个好的测试策略让团队知道"测什么、不测什么、为什么"——其中"不测什么"往往比"测什么"更能体现决策质量。输出风险矩阵、分级测试方案与准入准出标准的测试策略文档。 触发场景:测试策略、怎么测、测试计划、方案设计、测试范围、质量策略、新项目启动确定测试方案时。 Use when the user asks about: test strategy for a new project or iteration — scope, layered approach, entry and exit criteria, risk matrix, and tooling." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 417 lines in 4 files.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.