qa-test-automation-arch@1.8.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "当需要设计自动化测试框架、或者现有框架维护成本太高需要重构时使用此技能。运用 PageObject、分层测试、关键字驱动、数据驱动等模式设计可维护可扩展的自动化架构。不要直接写测试代码——先设计架构:选型(UI/API/单元)、分层(测试层/业务层/基础设施层)、数据管理(测试数据与脚本分离)和 CI 集成方案。好的自动化架构应该让写用例的人不需要懂底层实现。 触发场景:自动化架构、框架设计、自动化策略、自动化框架、测试框架架构、自动化维护困难需要重构时。 Use when the user asks about: test automation architecture — Page Object, layered test design, keyword-driven and data-driven frameworks, and data management." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 288 lines in 3 files.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.