Skills/ClawHub/qa-shift-right

qa-shift-right@1.8.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "当功能已经上线了但还担心线上质量、或者需要设计灰度发布后的验证方案时使用此技能。通过生产监控（APM/日志/用户反馈）、线上巡检拨测、A/B 验证和混沌工程将测试延伸到生产环境。不要把上线当成终点——用户在生产环境的使用方式是永远测不全的。输出右移验证方案（灰度监控指标 + 拨测用例 + 告警阈值 + 回滚触发条件）。 触发场景：测试右移、生产验证、灰度监控、混沌工程、线上灰度验证、上线后验证、需要规划线上监控与回滚策略时。 Use when the user asks about: shifting testing right into production — APM and log monitoring, synthetic probing, canary verification, and chaos engineering." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher kokxi · joined 5 days agoInstalls 1,222Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:21 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codeFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

No other findings across 314 lines in 3 files.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim kokxi