qa-scenario-tree@1.8.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "将需求解构的结果系统化转化为主路径、备选路径、异常路径、业务规则四类测试场景。当业务流程复杂、涉及多个页面跳转或状态变化、需要确保关键路径和异常路径都有覆盖时,应当使用此技能。不要只测"正常流程"——场景树的核心价值是暴露那些"用户可能不会按你预期操作"的分支和异常路径。每个场景带唯一 ID(SC-{模块缩写}-{序号})并关联回需求 ID(REQ-)。 触发场景:构建场景、测试场景、场景树、场景设计、测试路径、场景覆盖、业务流程复杂需要系统化梳理时。 Use when the user asks about: building a test scenario tree — main path, alternate path, exception path, and data flow scenarios with traceable SC-/REQ- IDs." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 430 lines in 4 files.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.