qa-requirement-review@1.8.0
VERIFIEDPublisher claims: "从完整性、清晰性、一致性、可测试性、可实现性五个维度系统化评审需求文档质量。当用户要求"评审这份需求"、"看看这个PRD写得怎么样"、或者测试用例设计前需要先评估需求质量时,应当使用此技能。如果需求本身有问题(模糊/矛盾/不可测试),后续的测试设计都是徒劳。不要只在用户明确说"需求评审"时才用——任何涉及需求文档的测试任务都应先过一遍需求评审。 触发场景:需求评审、评审需求、需求质量、PRD评审、需求检查、需求写得好不好、评审这份需求、需求提交测试前预审时。 Use when the user asks about: reviewing a PRD or requirement document for completeness, clarity, consistency, testability, and feasibility before test design starts." Observed in sandbox: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills ran it in the KillerSkills honeypot sandbox (1 scenario) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 91/100 (Verified). It did what it claims and nothing else we could detect: no undeclared network egress, no credential reads, no persistent instruction writes. Summary: no network, touches nothing outside the project, writes no memory.
Behavior trace
Honeypot run · 0 s · 1 scenarios · 0 deviationsStatic findings
No other findings across 444 lines in 4 files.