qa-regression-testing@1.8.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "根据变更范围、风险等级和时间约束制定分级精准回归方案。当版本迭代了、代码改动了、你需要确定"到底哪些功能要重新测一遍"的时候使用此技能。回归的时间永远不够——此技能帮你做出取舍决策：冒烟回归（P0核心流程）、核心回归（高影响区域）、全量回归（有余力时）。基于变更分析和风险评估选择最省时的回归策略，而不是盲目全量回归。 触发场景：回归测试、回归策略、回归范围、回归用例、冒烟测试、全量回归、回归不够时间、哪些要回归、版本迭代需要确定回归范围时。 Use when the user asks about: regression scope and strategy for a release — smoke, core, and full regression selected by change impact and risk when time is short." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 326 lines in 3 files.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.