qa-question-framework@1.8.0
CAUTIONPublisher claims: "当需求文档信息不够、不知道接下来该问产品什么、或者需要从开发那边获取更多技术细节时使用此技能。很多人测不好不是因为不会设计用例,而是因为一开始就没问对问题。提供需求调研、边界确认、规则挖掘、技术细节追问等不同场景的结构化提问模板,确保在测试设计前获取到足够上下文。每一个问题都标注了问谁、怎么问、什么时候问。 触发场景:不知道该问什么、怎么获取信息、需求不清楚、需要澄清、问什么问题、提问模板、和产品对需求、和开发沟通细节、需求文档信息不足需要补充时。 Use when the user asks about: structured questions to ask product and engineering to unblock test design — requirements research, boundary confirmation, rule mining, and technical detail follow-up." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No other findings across 338 lines in 3 files.
What would make this Verified
11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
- npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.