Skills/ClawHub/qa-quality-metrics

qa-quality-metrics@1.8.0

CAUTION

Publisher claims: "当管理层问"质量到底怎么样"、需要量化质量数据来做决策、或者想建立质量看板来跟踪趋势时使用此技能。从过程质量（需求评审通过率/用例覆盖度）、结果质量（Bug 密度/线上事故数）、效率（测试周期/回归耗时）和健康度（自动化通过率/环境稳定性）四个维度设计度量指标。⚠️ 度量的目的不是打分，是发现问题趋势——如果只报喜不报忧，度量就没用了。 触发场景：质量度量、质量指标、怎么量化质量、质量看板、质量数据、趋势分析、向管理层展示质量数据时。 Use when the user asks about: test quality metrics and dashboards — process, result, efficiency, and health indicators for management reporting." Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Registry ClawHubPublisher kokxi · joined 5 days agoInstalls 1,227Last detonated 5d ago
What would fix thisWatchDispute verdict

Is [email protected] safe to install?

KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-10-29 and scored it 69/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.

Behavior trace

Queued for honeypot run · static analysis only
t+CategoryObserved action

This version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.

Static findings

MEDIUM
npx invocation of non-well-known packageSKILL.md:19 · npx invocation of non-well-known package — may execute untrusted codeFix: Pin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
AST06

No other findings across 245 lines in 3 files.

What would make this Verified

11 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%
  1. Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim kokxi: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.
  2. npx invocation of non-well-known package≈ +2 on the totalPin versions and sources; vendor anything fetched at install time.
Publish a new version to ClawHub, then queue it here. Not your skill? Claim the handle to get verdict changes by email.Claim kokxi