psych312-scenario-analysis@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "312心理学考研·情景人物心理解析技能。当用户提供任意生活情景、短篇故事、人物行为片段、案例对话、影视情节、人际事件或学生案例时触发。基于312心理学统考官方核心考点（普通心理学、社会心理学、发展心理学、教育心理学、人格与临床基础），自动匹配对应考点，按固定三要素结构输出分析：专业名词 + 双解释（考研标准定义+通俗大白话）+ 结合情景原因分析。严格对标312考研大纲，无超纲内容，可直接用于做题、案例分析、知识点巩固。" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-08 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 148 lines in 2 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim tianzhen777: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.