psych-paper-deconstruction@1.0.0
CAUTION· static onlyPublisher claims: "心理学文献精读拆解助手。输入心理学论文（PDF/Word/文本），自动梳理研究假设、实验范式、自变量因变量、统计方法、研究局限与现实现实引申等结构化分析，输出可直接用于专业课作业的精读报告。触发词：精读论文、拆解文献、分析心理学论文、paper deconstruction、文献精读、论文拆解、实验范式分析。This skill should be used when a user provides a psychology research paper and wants a structured close-reading analysis covering hypotheses, exp" Observed in sandbox: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Coverage
Static only; nothing was run yet.The label rests on the code, the instruction files and the publisher. The honeypot run replaces this verdict when it completes.
Is [email protected] safe to install?
KillerSkills analysed it statically (a sandbox run is pending) on 2026-11-09 and scored it 71/100 (Caution). It is not known to be malicious, but it has behaviour or code a security policy should decide on before install. Summary: static analysis only — behavior not yet observed.
Behavior trace
Queued for honeypot run · static analysis onlyThis version has not been detonated yet. The score above counts behavior as unknown (50/100), so it cannot read Verified until the honeypot run completes and replaces this verdict.
Static findings
No findings across 687 lines in 4 files.
Cost to the agent
Tokens estimated at four characters each. Skills load their instruction text when triggered; the figure is what that costs.
Known vulnerabilities
Vulnerability advisories (OSV) cover npm and PyPI packages; this registry has no advisory database.
What would make this Verified
9 points to 80 · weights: behavior 45%, static 25%, prompt 15%, publisher 15%- Unclaimed publisher≈ +8 on the totalClaim qingjiu061: a verified publisher gets +50 on publisher trust. It is free and usually instant with GitHub sign-in.